Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction

Allegra Indraccolo, Charles Spence, Argiro Vatakis, Vanessa Harrar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ability to estimate a filled interval of time is affected by numerous non-temporal factors, such as the sensory modality, duration, and the intensity of the stimulus. Here we explore the role of modality (auditory or visual), stimulus intensity (low vs. high), and motor response speed on the ability to reproduce the duration of short (<1 s) filled intervals. In accordance with the literature, the reproduced duration was affected by both the modality and the intensity of the stimulus; longer reproduction times were generally observed for visual as compared to auditory stimuli, and for low as compared to high-intensity stimuli. We used general estimating equations in order to determine whether these factors independently affected participants’ ability to reproduce a given duration, after eliminating the variability associated with reaction time, since it covaried with the reproduced durations. This analysis revealed that stimulus duration, modality, and intensity were all significant independent predictors of the reproduced durations. Additionally, duration interacted with intensity when reproducing auditory intervals. That is, after taking into account the general speeding-up effect that high-intensity stimuli have on responses, they seem to have an additional effect on the rate of the internal clock. These results support previous evidence suggesting that auditory and visual clocks run at different speeds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1189-1198
Number of pages10
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume234
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Auditory
  • Processing speed
  • Stimulus magnitude
  • Time estimation
  • Visual

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this